Secondary 5 Ethics & Religious Studies
Ethics and Religious Studies: from three ethical frameworks and religious traditions, through moral-dilemma analysis, to multi-perspective study of life and social issues — descriptive and non-doctrinal, with DSE-style examples and quizzes.
The order below is the recommended shallow-to-deep path.
Units 單元
Tap a unit name to jump to its topics.
核心概念 Core Concepts1/1 live
⚡ Unit quiz 快測5 Qs
Answer on your own first, then reveal — wrong answers go to your wrong-answer book.
Q1What are the four steps of dilemma analysis?
Q2What is the main difficulty consequentialism faces in hard cases?
Q3What is the difficulty of conflicting duties in deontology?
Q4Where does secular ethics mainly differ from religious ethics?
Q5What formula should be used to state religious ethical positions?
應用與應試 Application and Exam Skills1/1 live
⚡ Unit quiz 快測5 Qs
Answer on your own first, then reveal — wrong answers go to your wrong-answer book.
Q1What three things must be discerned when reading materials?
Q2What are the two levels of divergence?
Q3What are the four movements of argumentative writing?
Q4What does the first beat of a concessive rebuttal do?
Q5What are the four columns of issue notes?
Vocabulary book 生字簿
All terms, bilingual (printable).
A situation in which two or more values are each valid yet cannot all be honoured.
The state in which different values clash within one situation.
The first step of analysis: listing the people, situation, options and consequences.
The views of those affected and of different ethical and religious perspectives.
In virtue ethics, the capacity to judge degree and act fittingly.
A situation in which several moral duties cannot all be fulfilled.
Ethical thinking grounded in reason and experience rather than religious faith.
Ethical thinking grounded in traditions of faith and scriptural teaching.
Exchange in which parties understand one another accurately and note differences and common ground.
A rebuttal that first restates the opponent's strongest reason fairly, then explains why one's position stands.
The technique of picking the material's key words to show where a view comes from.
Pointing out where materials diverge in factual judgement or in ordering values.
Reporting the material first, then one's own response, keeping the layers distinct.
The four parts of argumentative writing: stance, reasons, rebuttal and conclusion.
Revision notes on an issue in four columns: facts, values, positions, examples.
A position's tendency to rank values in order of priority.
Keeping the answer tied to the question's instructions and scope.
A paragraph carrying one reason tied to a concept in argumentative writing.